Should Rolling Stone be sued?

April 19th, 2011

I wrote a little while ago about how the freedom of speech apparently didn’t apply to all US citizens. I referred to the “resignation” of General McChrystal to prove my point. (It’s an open secret that senior military officers only “resign” when they’re fired. The rest simply retire.)

Now it seems that he needn’t have resigned after all. The Pentagon has reported that, having investigated the allegations made in an article by Rolling Stone, he was not guilty of misconduct after all. The magazine, however, stands by its article.

220

Image via Wikipedia

The whole ordeal rather begs the question, however: Should the magazine be sued? If the actions of one party cause the other party to lose its livelihood and then later it’s discovered that the “evidence” used were false, doesn’t that amount to defamation of character, and isn’t the publication of the tainted data libel?

I think I can hear the lawyers sharpening their pencils.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

To AV or Not to AV

April 18th, 2011

For those of you who don’t know, AV stands for alternative voting, the latest political euphemism to be presented to voters in the United Kingdom. The general public will face a referendum on it during the first week in May.

I’ve wanted to say something about this for some time; but I deliberately left it a bit late so that those of you who are still unsure whether to AV or not to AV will have the opportunity to consider my words nearer to the time.

The yea-sayers would have you believe that the present “first past the post” system is unfair to the smaller political parties in that they get little, if any, representation if they fail to garner enough votes to win the seat outright. In practice, this is true. But, think about it. Isn’t that what democracy is about? A slate of candidates or policies is offered to the voters, and the majority opinion carries the day?

The nay-sayers argue that the AV system will give the minor political parties the balance of power by fragmenting the total vote into infinitesimal pieces. At the moment, many feel that this view is nothing short of scare-mongering.

Naturally, an alternative system seems attractive, especially given the fact that no one received an outright majority in the last election about a year ago. This approach appears to be fairer, too, because under it every party gets the proportion of the total vote, hence the name by which it has been formally known: proportional representation.

Let’s consider a real world example of this system that is already in place. In Italy, where I live at present, the ballot contained 150+ political parties. So the total vote was divided proportionately by the number of parties for whom even one vote was cast.  According to Wikipedia, no party has ever been able to obtain a majority. So if you think that AV would resolve the current Conservative-Liberal Democrat problem, then think again.

announcement of elections in Brunate (near Com...

Image via Wikipedia

If the system is changed, then the country is more likely to face coalition governments forever. Far from giving people more representation, it will give them less, and could paralyze the political system entirely. Perhaps this is one reason why Italy has had, on average, a general election every 18 months. Politicians who are always running for reelection don’t have time to run the country.

Look at the United States. It can’t even pass a budget with two parties and a few independents. Can you imagine what it would be like if there were five or ten parties. There’s a reason why it’s the minority parties that are in favor of AV.

Let’s go back to the UK. Why parties have been trying to get into power over the years that have failed to do so under the current system. Here are some for you to think about: The Monster-Raving Loony Party; the Pirate Party; the No Candidate Deserves My Vote Party; the Idle Toad Party; the Communist Party of Britain; the Church of the Militant Elvis Party. Need I go on?

If you think that politics can’t get any worse, then trust me: It can. Voting for AV is tantamount to saying that you’d like to see all of the parties I just mentioned and about 350 others share a proportion of the power held by Whitehall. If that’s the case, then I might have to start the You Must be Out of Your Mind Party. After all, someone has to bring some sense and sensibility to the government.

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Breaching the Peace

March 29th, 2011

What constitutes a breach of the peace?  Is it practicing the trumpet at 2 am in your apartment? Could it be a little squiffiness in a public place? Or, do you have to yell “Fire!” in a crowded theatre to be guilty?

Even as I write this, I’m listening to car horns blaring outside. Are those drivers disturbing my peace and tranquility. Yes, they are; but I suspect that the overwhelming majority, not to mention the six varieties of police here in Italy would disagree.

One thing that does seem common to all of these, and that’s the personal nature of the event. I checked a few definitions before writing this post, and all of them referred to any action that upset the normal state of things in a society. Granted, normality in the US is likely to be different than that in Britain, Italy, or India. But, the general tenor of a society is certainly observable and often can be felt as well.

In the 1970s, I visited Leipzig, in what was then East Germany. I’d gone for a walk in the evening. I remember there being only three or four of us who were out that night: Me, the person walking with me, and two heavily armed soldiers. Apart from that, the view was absent of anything else that moved. It was quiet, even eery. Anything louder than a whisper would have been noticeable.

Visastempel der DDR

Image via Wikipedia

There’s another type of disturbance that seems to have been omitted from current legislation and that’s noise that’s not caused directly by another person. Think of alarms for cars and buildings. They’re designed to warn the owners of imminent theft or vandalism, and fire; but sometimes they also go off because of wind, hail, domestic and other furry animals and, in the case of buildings, the mere whiff of smoke particles. No doubt you’ll agree with me that any alarm noise is unpleasant, and anything more than a few minutes of it is disturbing.

If you’ve ever lived next to a facility that was similarly equipped, I’m sure you’ll emphathize with the case I’m about to relay to you. It concerns one Peter Shalson, a resident of St John’s Wood in northwest London. Apparently, he hadn’t been getting too well with his neighbors Norman and Cindy Dawood over the years; and so when the alarm in the house next door went off, it was the straw that broke the camel’s back. The owners were away at the time when the alarm began to sound. Mr Shalson’s wife was sick in bed, and after seven hours, he was ready to commit both himself and his wife to a farm with padded cells. At least it would have been quieter.

But, poor Mr Shalson had a flight to catch; so at 2 am, he got out his trusty weapon and shot the alarm to pieces, or is that peaces? Anyway, it was peace at last. The court sentenced him to 200 hours of community service and fined him about $900. The judge said that his actions distressed the neighbors.

I can only imagine that either none of them had been home when the alarm was ringing or they all had their hearing aids turned off.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

A Ton (Tonne) of People?

March 28th, 2011

If you’ve ever watched any of the videos that are available about how to make money online, you’ll have heard this phrase: “I’ve (We’ve) helped a ton of people.”

It occurred to me that that’s not all that many. If memory serves, an ordinary ton is just 2000 lbs, and a metric tonne is 2200 pounds. That’s only 20-22 100 lb people, or 10-11 200 lb people. If you’re dealing with big boys and girls, say from the Biggest Loser, it’s likely to be much fewer than that!

I remember Peter Schickele referring, some years ago, to a large body of opinion. It turned out that that was only one person.

P. D. Q. Bach and Peter Schickele: The Jekyll ...

Image via Wikipedia

There are other ways that our language has become more euphemistic with time. It used to be that the word few meant about ‘three.’ Several meant ‘five to seven.’ Nowadays, ‘several’ usually means three, or even less.

All of this points to the importance of using precision to say what we mean.

The next time someone uses a ‘collective noun’ to describe a group of people, be sure to ask just how many they had in mind. You may be surprised at the answer.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Free Speech or Falling on Your Sword?

March 14th, 2011

The Obama administration has done it again. They’ve quashed free speech. How? By denying P J Crowley his first amendment rights.

Media-ite reports that the former Assistant Secretary of Public Affairs and Spokesman for the US State Department resigned over comments he made about the incarceration of Private First Class Manning. (Manning allegedly gave WikiLeaks thousands of classified messages.)

In his words, Crowley referred to Manning’s solitary confinement as “ridiculous, counterproductive and stupid.” Hardly seems like a resigning offence to me. I mean, it’s not as if he misspent $13 trillion. That would have been much worse.

Hierarchy of the U.S State Department. Click t...

Image via Wikipedia

I wanted to say that one of the signs of a healthy democracy was differences of opinion; but then I thought of the US Congress. Disagreement is one thing; but bickering to the point of paralyzing the country’s finances is quite another.

In the UK, party unity has been the be-all and end-all for all of the governments I can remember in the past 30-something years, and probably for longer than that. Recently, however, this has become less of an issue, except just before a general election, because it’s then that the declining parties usually start to whip the naysayers into line. I haven’t figured out why the bother, to be honest, as the voters are already sick of them.

When people are forced to resign because they no longer agree with the government they are supposed to be serving, it’s time for the politicians to take some time to reflect.

Dictators force people into resignation, or just fire them. Fanatical dictators usually trump up false charges, such as treason, so that they can permanently rid themselves of any opposition.

The citizens in every democracy should demand that their rights are upheld by the highest in the land. Therefore, Prime Ministers and Presidents alike must defend free speech, whether they like it or not.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Wrong Person for the Job

March 9th, 2011

In the online edition of the Independent newspaper, Colin Matthews, the Chief Executive of Heathrow Airport, is reported to have said that the reason customers were stranded at the airport for several days in December was because they received the “wrong amount of snow.”

Pardon?

This sounds more like an excuse, than a reason. In fact, it bears a striking resemblance to the logic often used by the train companies there. Every year, they tell us that their delayed services were due to the “wrong kind of leaves” on the track, as if a) there was a right kind, and b) that even though the tracks have been there for more than 100 years, they’re nevertheless surprised that the trees growing alongside for the entire time dropped their leaves this year.

Terminal 5 at London Heathrow Airport

Image via Wikipedia

Perhaps the Chief Executives for these companies ought to ride the trains to work.

In a “previous” life, I was a weather forecaster, and so I can tell you that blaming the elements instead of admitting to poor planning is the oldest game in town. But you would expect that someone who had been called before the House of Commons Transport Committee could have been a little more creative; after all, that’s why they’re given all those dance lessons.

It seems to me that all those passengers were stranded at Heathrow, not because of the wrong kind of snow on the ground, but because of the wrong person running the airport. With about eight months to go before the next snowstorm, there’s still time to find someone else.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Dumb and Dumber

March 7th, 2011

Like you, I need a snack periodically. One of choices that I tend to reach for is a Met-RX Protein Plus Bar. With 32g of protein in it, it’s more like a small meal than a snack. The carbohydrate content is mostly sugar alcohols which, if you didn’t know already, are neither sugar nor alcohol; but, that’s another story.

On the wrapper is this most peculiar warning: “Tamper resistant: Do not use if foil wrapper is torn or missing.”

You have to wonder who writes these things.

If I don’t tear the wrapper, how can I get inside? If I can’t get inside, how can I partake of the protein advertised on the outside of the wrapper?

And what about the next bit? If the wrapper is missing, how can I read the warning?

Banal instructions such as this are not limited to this brand of protein bar. I remember seeing a warning on a bottle of Welch’s Sparkling Grape Juice that warned anyone foolish enough to open it not to aim it at anyone else. Somehow, I don’t think that there was any risk of it becoming a “weapon of choice.”

Fast food restaurants are fond of putting warnings on their coffee cups and toasted apple pies that admonish the mildly starving that the contents are hot. I suspect that they are a result of the infamous case of the woman who after going through the drive-in at McDonald’s spilled coffee on herself after putting the full cup in her lap. Hands up all those who could have predicted that one! (I hope that all of you in that judge’s constituency have had the sense to vote him out of office.)

I’m not sure who’s to blame: the manufacturers, the government, or the legal system. One thing’s for certain. No matter how dumb the behavior, you can always find someone else who is willing to be dumber still.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Time to Give Congress a Pink Slip

March 3rd, 2011

Whether you live in the US or not, you must be tired of hearing about how the US Congress squabbles over money! I know that I am.

The 100 senators and 435 representatives in the House have been elected to do one thing only, and that’s to look after the interests of their constituents. How do they do that? By creating and passing a budget that spends the tax dollars they receive. How hard can that be?

Thus far, they’ve managed to create a record annual deficit, not to mention the record cumulative deficit that stretches back more than 150 years.

Traditionally, America used peacetime and prosperity to pay down its debts; but in the last 30 years this hasn’t been the norm. The US Government has spent more than it took in for years, regardless of the economic climate. Why? Because they could.

Cutting the budget has never been popular with voters, and so few politicians have had the backbone to stand up to them and do the necessary.

Unofficial seal of the United States Congress

Image via Wikipedia

I don’t know about you, but I’m in favor of changing the names on the Senate and House buildings to The Houses of Inverterbrates. That seems to be a much better description of those who “work” there; after all, it has become a zoo.

The fiscal year in the US begins on October 1st. It’s been like that since 1976, when it began on July 1st. It was slipped a few months to give Congress more time to agree on spending. The funny thing is that it was only for that year that there actually was extra time. Think about it: If they had a year from July 1st of 1975 to June 30th of 1976 to approve the budget, then that’s 12 months. If you add another three to make the new fiscal year begin on October 1st, then the total length of time to consider the new budget it 15 months.

But, what happens during the subsequent years? I’ll tell you. The financial year begins on October 1st and ends on September 30th of the following year. That’s just 12 months. And it’s like that every year unless Congress passes its now infamous “continuing resolutions.”

Oh the jargon. A continuing resolution is nothing more than a small bill that says we’re going to keep on spending money until we can figure out what to do, or the bill expires. Whichever comes first. (If you’re an insomniac, and you’ve already tried all other remedies, then read this. It may be your best night!)

Apparently no one wants to use the “S” word – Shutdown! But, unless the ninnies on Capitol Hill do something they’ve never done before – agree – there will be a lot of people on unpaid leave starting tomorrow.

By the way. I have a solution to this mess. We should give them all a pink slip and put ordinary, hard-working citizens in there to run the country instead of the career politicians. Then, just maybe, we could begin to cut spending by denuding the Congressman of their extravagant perks and salaries.

Enhanced by Zemanta

How to Make Others Rich Quickly

February 27th, 2011

Do you want to know how to help others get rich quickly? Yeah. You read that right. There’s lots of baloney out there about how to get stinking rich yourself; but because I’m sure all of you are benevolent at heart and therefore would rather make others rich, I thought I’d at least give you the chance. Give up?

Actually, it’s a bit of a trick question. You make others rich quickly by responding to their pleas (with your wallet) to attempt to do so for yourself by buying their product. Of course, the vendors don’t put it like that.

Proverbs says that a fool and his (or her) money is soon parted. The internet makes it easier than ever, though I’m sure you knew that already.

That said, there are a couple of people who I really trust. One is Lee McIntyre and the other is Terry Dean. I wholeheartedly recommend them to you. These guys are honest and deliver more value in five minutes than others do in a lifetime. So there’s my endorsement for them.

So why do I mention them in a post like this one? For the simple reason that they, like other honest people, are affiliates for others who don’t seem quite above board. I can’t really mention any names here without opening myself up to a lawsuit. What I can do is let you in on a little trick I discovered that allowed me to satisfy my curiosity without wasting any time and/or money.

Videos

In my opinion, any sensible salesperson – that means you want to maintain your credibility throughout – will include a play/pause/duration bar at the bottom of the video. You’ve probably noticed that this isn’t the case very often, and is occurring less often even as you read this. I’m pretty sure that the reason for that is to prevent people like you and me from skipping to the punch line.

But, this little trick takes advantage of their greed. Just make a mental note of the product name, and then search for it on YouTube.  I did this for Income Infuser. For one thing, I wanted to know how long the video would last, and for another I found myself switching off the sound because all the sales examples, testimonials, and other hype was nauseating, to say the least.

YouTube doesn’t care who you are; you can’t delete their duration bar. So, first I clicked the pause button so that I could see how long the video was. I couldn’t believe that it was a staggering 50 minutes+. No wonder I was queasy! Next, I grabbed the progress ball and dragged it to about the halfway point. I waited for a short time for the download to catch up with my wishes, and then kept doing this until I’d seen enough to know what it was about. Take it from me: This is a video you can miss  that is, of course, unless you need a bona fide reason to call in sick for work.

Downloading

You can also download the video, and then watch it in your favorite player. This, too, will give you Pause and Progress buttons so that you can control how much rubbish you allow to pass in front of your eyes and into your ears.  (Aren’t you glad that the Web isn’t scratch and sniff?)

Although the file may be quite large (the II I mentioned above was more than 300MB), your player will also tell you how long it is before you commit an evening to watching it on your home theatre. (Don’t forget the popcorn.)

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Is This the Right Thing to Do?

February 1st, 2011

The overriding motivations in the public sector are image and politics. Image is about being seen to do the right thing, and politics is about retaining and extending personal power while being seen to do the right thing.

Let’s look at a classic example of the first one.

Crime Map

According to the Independent newspaper, England and Wales have become the first two countries in the world to release a street-by-street map of the incidents of crime in a given neighborhood. All you have to do is go to the Police web site and enter the post code (zip code) for the area that interests you.

You will then be shown a “crime map.” The information will be updated monthly, and you’ll be able to access it from your mobile phones and obtain GPS coordinates.

Mounted officer of the British Metropolitan Po...
Image via Wikipedia

No doubt there will be those who’ll wonder why I’ve identified this as Another Fine Mess. Dark alleys, secluded areas, and blind spots in camera surveillance will reveal all the most likely hives of criminal activity, right? And that should forewarn the public to exercise especial vigilance, which must be a good thing; wouldn’t you agree?

So why isn’t it the right thing to do?

UK Housing Market

At present, the number of applications for re-mortgages in the United Kingdom is nearly at its lowest ever (just one in three), and the number of actual mortgages sought has also dropped. House prices are at their lowest for four years and are predicted to fall even further in 2011.

Between the caution shown by lenders, who want to avoid bad loans, and the uncertainty of buyers, who are more concerned about the security of their jobs, the market could hardly be more fragile.

Best Places to Live

Nearly every study that shows where the best places are to live, there is also a category that identifies the level of crime. And it’s no surprise that those areas that have less of it, also feature highest on the list of desirable places to abide.

The Crime Map, of course, makes them much easier to identify down to a margin of just a dozen houses.

This means that, as a home owner, you could suddenly find yourself living in a pocket where the value of your house could sink – out of sight.

More Crime

Why should that concern us? Because neighborhoods that are characterized by low prices also tend to attract  . . . more crime.

If the British Government thinks that by narrowing down the worst areas according to the incidence of murders, rapes, and burglaries is a good thing, then they’d better think again.

Not only will prices suffer, but it will wave a flag for hooligans everywhere that pickings are better in some places than others.

No doubt the police will say that these statistics prove that they are more effective in those areas.

That, however, seems to be an unlikely explanation because, as we all know, that they can’t arrest everyone. So, it’s probable that the increase in arrests will occur in those areas where the there’s more crime in the first place.

How can I come to such a dire conclusion? It’s perfectly logical.

The Police all across the country have been complaining for years that they lack the resources to do the job they’ve been trained to do, which is to protect the public. Therefore, they can’t claim that they’re so efficient that they’re arresting more people than ever, while at the same time claiming that these cuts have put the public in greater danger.

Either the public is safer, or they’re not. Which is it?

Undesirable Living Spaces

The Crime Map, in my opinion, will have the opposite effect to that which is intended. It will not only warn the public not to live there, but it also will prevent many of those who no longer want to from leaving.

Unless the policy is reversed, these areas will get worse, not better.

And do you know what the really scary thing is about this nutty idea? Because it looks like the right thing to do and the technology exists so that it can be done, other free nations are likely to do the same thing.

Heaven help us!

Enhanced by Zemanta